Dear Members and Friends,
Below you will find the tentative program for the UGAT conference. Kindly help us disseminate the information to other interested participants. We already have a DECS memorandum to help you formalize your leave. Pls. check out www.decs.gov.ph memo#49.
The call for posters is still open to students, graduate students, institutions and other participants. Share with us your new projects, research findings or even your thesis and dissertation! Poster size should be 30"x40" or a whole illustration board. Limited slots (20 - 25). Kindly confirm with us your interest so we can make arrangements for other materials you might need.
We will appreciate if you can also confirm your attendance to the dinner presentation.
Let us know of your needs. We hope to see you in Manila!
Melanie Uy
The Working Committee
UGAT 2001 Conference
email: ugat2001@hotmail.com
UGAT Office
Rm. 208, Philippine Social Science Center
Commonwealth Avenue
Diliman, Quezon City
Philippines
phone: (+63 2) 4561918
FAX: (+63 2) 9202197
Tentative Program Link: http://ugat-aap.blogspot.com/2001/09/ugat-23th-annual-conference-schedule-of.html
Friday, September 21, 2001
Friday, October 31, 1997
UGAT 19th Annual Conference - In Photos
UGNAYANG PANG-AGHAMTAO, INC. (UGAT)
Anthropological Association of the Philippines
19th Annual Conference
TERRITORIALITY, HISTORIES AND IDENTITIES
29-31 October 1997
Puerto Princesa City, Palawan
Anthropological Association of the Philippines
19th Annual Conference
TERRITORIALITY, HISTORIES AND IDENTITIES
29-31 October 1997
Puerto Princesa City, Palawan
IN PHOTOS
Boi Abaya
Maria Mahangas / Sweet Cabanilla / Lerma de Lima-Yambot
Datu Antonio Lumandong, Kahiusahan sa mga Higaonon, Inc. (KHI)
Satur Ocampo / Eizel Hilario / Anthony John Balisi / Betch Mercado
Thursday, October 24, 1996
Aghamtao 8
Aghamtao: Journal of the Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc. (UGAT) / Anthropological Association of the Philippines
Volume 8 / 1996
Citation:
Aghamtao 8.
Selected Papers from National Conferences of UGAT.
*UGAT Conferences: “Anthropology of Development,” Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila; “Sustainability of Development: Anthropological Perspective,” University of san Carlos, Cebu City; “The Anthropology of Transformation: Issues and Concerns of Industrialization and Development,” Mindanao State Unviersity, General Santos, Cotabato; and “The Anthropology of Disaster,” Central Luzon State University, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija.
Quezon City: Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc.
Daisy Y. Noval-MoralesEditor in Chief
Eufracio C. Abaya
Maria Luisa Lucas-FernanEditorial Board
Table of Contents:
Preface
Eufracio C. Abaya
Mataw Fishing in Batanes
Maria F. Mangahas
The Ivatan Cultural Adaptation to Typhoons: A Portrait of a Self-Reliant Community from the Indigenous Development Perspectives
Fr. Raymundo Rede Blolong, SVD
Ormoc Revisited: Initial and Long Term Stress Reactions and Coping Responses of Disaster Victims
Patricia Rosario E. Alix
Higugmaa and Diyos, Kahadloki ang Diyos (Love God, Fear God: Post-Ormoc Disaster Mass Hysteria in an Urban Center
Jose Eleazar R. Bersales and Fiscalina A. Nolasco
Amin Ito: Who Controls “Disaster Management”?
Ponciano L. Bennagen
Ang Antropolohiya ng Disaster sa Punto-de-Bista ng mga Ayta (Ang Mga Ayta ng Banawan, Maloma, San Felipe, Zambales, Bilang Isang Halimbawa)
Leonardo R. Estacio, Jr.
Anthropology and Disaster: Deforestation
Daylinda B. Cabanilla
Higaonons and Bukidnon Forests Incorporated: “Will the Twain Ever Meet?”
Levita Duhaylungsod
Sipag, Tiyaga at Tipid: Women in Shoe Manufacturing
Zenaida Quesada-Reyes
Ethnic and Gender Dimensions of Indigenous Knowledge: The Case of the Maranao Muslims’ Sweetpotato Production
Belita Amihan-Vega
Ethnography or Espionage: The Problem of Ethics in Philippine Anthropology
Nestor T. Castro
Museology, Identity and the Transformation of Material Culture
Ana P. Labrador
The Contributors
Download Articles Here:
http://116.50.242.171/PSSC/index.php/agt01/issue/view/205
Source:
Private Collection
Volume 8 / 1996
Citation:
Aghamtao 8.
Selected Papers from National Conferences of UGAT.
*UGAT Conferences: “Anthropology of Development,” Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Sta. Mesa, Manila; “Sustainability of Development: Anthropological Perspective,” University of san Carlos, Cebu City; “The Anthropology of Transformation: Issues and Concerns of Industrialization and Development,” Mindanao State Unviersity, General Santos, Cotabato; and “The Anthropology of Disaster,” Central Luzon State University, Muñoz, Nueva Ecija.
Quezon City: Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc.
Daisy Y. Noval-MoralesEditor in Chief
Eufracio C. Abaya
Maria Luisa Lucas-FernanEditorial Board
Table of Contents:
Preface
Eufracio C. Abaya
Mataw Fishing in Batanes
Maria F. Mangahas
The Ivatan Cultural Adaptation to Typhoons: A Portrait of a Self-Reliant Community from the Indigenous Development Perspectives
Fr. Raymundo Rede Blolong, SVD
Ormoc Revisited: Initial and Long Term Stress Reactions and Coping Responses of Disaster Victims
Patricia Rosario E. Alix
Higugmaa and Diyos, Kahadloki ang Diyos (Love God, Fear God: Post-Ormoc Disaster Mass Hysteria in an Urban Center
Jose Eleazar R. Bersales and Fiscalina A. Nolasco
Amin Ito: Who Controls “Disaster Management”?
Ponciano L. Bennagen
Ang Antropolohiya ng Disaster sa Punto-de-Bista ng mga Ayta (Ang Mga Ayta ng Banawan, Maloma, San Felipe, Zambales, Bilang Isang Halimbawa)
Leonardo R. Estacio, Jr.
Anthropology and Disaster: Deforestation
Daylinda B. Cabanilla
Higaonons and Bukidnon Forests Incorporated: “Will the Twain Ever Meet?”
Levita Duhaylungsod
Sipag, Tiyaga at Tipid: Women in Shoe Manufacturing
Zenaida Quesada-Reyes
Ethnic and Gender Dimensions of Indigenous Knowledge: The Case of the Maranao Muslims’ Sweetpotato Production
Belita Amihan-Vega
Ethnography or Espionage: The Problem of Ethics in Philippine Anthropology
Nestor T. Castro
Museology, Identity and the Transformation of Material Culture
Ana P. Labrador
The Contributors
Download Articles Here:
http://116.50.242.171/PSSC/index.php/agt01/issue/view/205
Source:
Private Collection
Wednesday, October 23, 1996
Aghamtao 8: Preface
Aghamtao: Journal of the Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc. (UGAT) / Anthropological Association of the Philippines
Volume 8 / 1996
Preface
This journal puts together a selection of papers read in annual UGAT conferences* held in various settings at different times (1991 to 1995). It brings to bear viewpoints expressed by local anthropologists and related practitioners regarding the anthropology of development and sustainability, disaster, gender, ethnicity, and the practice of anthropology itself. More importantly, it is the intention of these papers to promote anthropological perspectives as options in academic and development endeavors.
The tenacity of indigenous knowledge and practices serves as the point of departure of Mangahas’ and Blolong’s papers. Mangahas provides a rich description of the mataw, a traditional mode of using and managing fisheries among the Ivatans of Batanes, and calls attention to the conflicts brought about by the introduction of new technologies. She observes that existing state development policies are insensitive to local modes of resource management, hence the need for a critical examination of such policies. Relatedly, Blolong takes an adaptionist model of culture in arguing for the strengths of Ivatan coping strategies to an environment frequently hit by typhoons. These strategies are manifested in their agricultural practices and material culture.
Disasters and their impact on people’s lives constitute another subject matter in this volume, albeit treated in various ways by contributors. Stress reactions and coping responses among the ‘victims’ of the catastrophic flood that occurred in Ormoc on November 5, 1991 are examined by Alix using a psychological framework. For Alix, stress reactions and coping strategies are mediated by such factors as gender, age, and the workings of multiple stressors.
Popular awareness of the Ormoc tragedy provided the stage for the mass hysteria that occurred in Cebu City, as presented in the paper of Bersales and Nolasco. This mass hysteria was triggered by a letter aired over a local radio station urging people to post signs in their homes and public spaces carrying the message “Love (higugmaa) God, fear (kahadloki) God.” Failure to do so, according to the news, would lead to a disaster worse that that which occurred in Ormoc. The authors, by and large, attributed this phenomenon to the characteristic Cebuano religiosity and moral values, following partly theoretical lead of symbolic anthropology like Geertz.
In a certain sense, the separate papers of Bennagen and Estacio took a different theoretical stance in exploring the dynamics of disaster management, using the ase of Ayta communities affected by the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. Rejecting conventional knowledge that sees disaster during victims as passive actors, both authors provide concrete ethnographic example to illustrate that active role played by the Aytas in managing their lives. In particular, Bennagen showed the ways in which the Aytas have subverted the representations and actions of the state in the formulation and implementation of disaster management programs. This process, according to him may be attributed to the “mediating role of the value-driven NGO and … high level political consciousness of the community which allows it to draw on its own cultural resources.” In addition, it is Bennagen’s contention that sustainability could be achieved through a process of community organizing that derives its framework and strategies from community traditions. On the other hand, Estacio provides a processual view of how an Ayta community has struggled against both the encroachment of outsiders upon their ancestral lands as well as the culturally-insensitive state-led resettlement schemes. This case study brings to bear the ways in which victims of disaster draw on their cultural resources, including indigenous knowledge systems and practices, to define and act upon pressures from external forces.
Deforestation lends itself to a critical anthropological analysis, a position taken by Cabanilla in analyzing the issue of deforestation in the Philippines. Drawing on the tradition of holism and cultural analysis, she calls attention to the limitations of existing official definitions of deforestation as these fails to situate the problem within wider social and cultural contexts. In arguing so, she maintains that deforestation is caused by state, private, and military interests. Like most of the contributors to this volume, she underscored the importance of local knowledge and community participation in development programs.
Again, the theme of human agency in social development resonates in Duhaylungsod’s paper. She critically examines the role played by internal colonialism (as expressed in state policies) and capitalist expansion in the invasion of Higaonon ancestral domain. Specifically, she takes up the case of the state-initiated Bukidnon Forest Incorporated, which suffers from a limited understand of the issue of ancestral domain as well as absence of genuine initiatives to engage local participation in program management.
Local anthropologists contribute to the discourse on gender as exemplified by the separate papers of Quesada-Reyes and Amihan-Vega. The first keys in the strategies women employ as shoe factory workers in asserting their position as productive agents in local economy as they deviate from traditional roles engendered by the workings of the ideology of patriarchy, grounded in local forms of understanding. In effect, her paper provides an antidote to the artificial application of Western feminist perspectives in local gender studies. The second paper, on the other hand, factors in gender, along with ethnicity, in the analysis of indigenous knowledge in sweetpotato production among the Maranao. In doing so, it emphasizes the notion of complementarity between male and female roles in agricultural production – an observation that contributes to the critique of Western feminism that gives primary to ‘difference’ over ‘complementarity’ in gender relations.
Part of the analysis of anthropology of development is the issue of professional ethics. Castro takes a reflexive mode in writing about ethics in anthropological work. He pays heed to the call for greater observance of ethics among anthropologists, whose profession has been historically linked with colonization and counterinsurgency. His paper is an important reminder for local anthropologists involved in development work to deepen their consciousness of the politics of data collection and dissemination. Here, the process of the human subjects is of paramount importance. With this in mind, he strongly suggests a reexamination of UGAT’s code of ethics.
The politics of identity formations and legitimation is another issue that invariably interests local anthropologists. The final paper by Labrador attests to this. She examines the process of identity formation through the technologies of ethnographic museums, arguing against the fixity of identities. She brings into light the contested character of ethnicities in a given political economic formation. Museums, among other settings, Labrador contends, create identities. Objects are, in effect, invested with the power to mark ethnicities.
Finally, these annual conferences were attended by representatives of the academe, non-governmental organizations, the government, and people’s organizations. This is reflective of the agenda of UGAT to surface relevant and urgent issues and to foster exchange swirling around the discipline’s theoretical and methodological concerns.
Eufracio C. Abaya
President, UGAT
Volume 8 / 1996
Preface
This journal puts together a selection of papers read in annual UGAT conferences* held in various settings at different times (1991 to 1995). It brings to bear viewpoints expressed by local anthropologists and related practitioners regarding the anthropology of development and sustainability, disaster, gender, ethnicity, and the practice of anthropology itself. More importantly, it is the intention of these papers to promote anthropological perspectives as options in academic and development endeavors.
The tenacity of indigenous knowledge and practices serves as the point of departure of Mangahas’ and Blolong’s papers. Mangahas provides a rich description of the mataw, a traditional mode of using and managing fisheries among the Ivatans of Batanes, and calls attention to the conflicts brought about by the introduction of new technologies. She observes that existing state development policies are insensitive to local modes of resource management, hence the need for a critical examination of such policies. Relatedly, Blolong takes an adaptionist model of culture in arguing for the strengths of Ivatan coping strategies to an environment frequently hit by typhoons. These strategies are manifested in their agricultural practices and material culture.
Disasters and their impact on people’s lives constitute another subject matter in this volume, albeit treated in various ways by contributors. Stress reactions and coping responses among the ‘victims’ of the catastrophic flood that occurred in Ormoc on November 5, 1991 are examined by Alix using a psychological framework. For Alix, stress reactions and coping strategies are mediated by such factors as gender, age, and the workings of multiple stressors.
Popular awareness of the Ormoc tragedy provided the stage for the mass hysteria that occurred in Cebu City, as presented in the paper of Bersales and Nolasco. This mass hysteria was triggered by a letter aired over a local radio station urging people to post signs in their homes and public spaces carrying the message “Love (higugmaa) God, fear (kahadloki) God.” Failure to do so, according to the news, would lead to a disaster worse that that which occurred in Ormoc. The authors, by and large, attributed this phenomenon to the characteristic Cebuano religiosity and moral values, following partly theoretical lead of symbolic anthropology like Geertz.
In a certain sense, the separate papers of Bennagen and Estacio took a different theoretical stance in exploring the dynamics of disaster management, using the ase of Ayta communities affected by the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. Rejecting conventional knowledge that sees disaster during victims as passive actors, both authors provide concrete ethnographic example to illustrate that active role played by the Aytas in managing their lives. In particular, Bennagen showed the ways in which the Aytas have subverted the representations and actions of the state in the formulation and implementation of disaster management programs. This process, according to him may be attributed to the “mediating role of the value-driven NGO and … high level political consciousness of the community which allows it to draw on its own cultural resources.” In addition, it is Bennagen’s contention that sustainability could be achieved through a process of community organizing that derives its framework and strategies from community traditions. On the other hand, Estacio provides a processual view of how an Ayta community has struggled against both the encroachment of outsiders upon their ancestral lands as well as the culturally-insensitive state-led resettlement schemes. This case study brings to bear the ways in which victims of disaster draw on their cultural resources, including indigenous knowledge systems and practices, to define and act upon pressures from external forces.
Deforestation lends itself to a critical anthropological analysis, a position taken by Cabanilla in analyzing the issue of deforestation in the Philippines. Drawing on the tradition of holism and cultural analysis, she calls attention to the limitations of existing official definitions of deforestation as these fails to situate the problem within wider social and cultural contexts. In arguing so, she maintains that deforestation is caused by state, private, and military interests. Like most of the contributors to this volume, she underscored the importance of local knowledge and community participation in development programs.
Again, the theme of human agency in social development resonates in Duhaylungsod’s paper. She critically examines the role played by internal colonialism (as expressed in state policies) and capitalist expansion in the invasion of Higaonon ancestral domain. Specifically, she takes up the case of the state-initiated Bukidnon Forest Incorporated, which suffers from a limited understand of the issue of ancestral domain as well as absence of genuine initiatives to engage local participation in program management.
Local anthropologists contribute to the discourse on gender as exemplified by the separate papers of Quesada-Reyes and Amihan-Vega. The first keys in the strategies women employ as shoe factory workers in asserting their position as productive agents in local economy as they deviate from traditional roles engendered by the workings of the ideology of patriarchy, grounded in local forms of understanding. In effect, her paper provides an antidote to the artificial application of Western feminist perspectives in local gender studies. The second paper, on the other hand, factors in gender, along with ethnicity, in the analysis of indigenous knowledge in sweetpotato production among the Maranao. In doing so, it emphasizes the notion of complementarity between male and female roles in agricultural production – an observation that contributes to the critique of Western feminism that gives primary to ‘difference’ over ‘complementarity’ in gender relations.
Part of the analysis of anthropology of development is the issue of professional ethics. Castro takes a reflexive mode in writing about ethics in anthropological work. He pays heed to the call for greater observance of ethics among anthropologists, whose profession has been historically linked with colonization and counterinsurgency. His paper is an important reminder for local anthropologists involved in development work to deepen their consciousness of the politics of data collection and dissemination. Here, the process of the human subjects is of paramount importance. With this in mind, he strongly suggests a reexamination of UGAT’s code of ethics.
The politics of identity formations and legitimation is another issue that invariably interests local anthropologists. The final paper by Labrador attests to this. She examines the process of identity formation through the technologies of ethnographic museums, arguing against the fixity of identities. She brings into light the contested character of ethnicities in a given political economic formation. Museums, among other settings, Labrador contends, create identities. Objects are, in effect, invested with the power to mark ethnicities.
Finally, these annual conferences were attended by representatives of the academe, non-governmental organizations, the government, and people’s organizations. This is reflective of the agenda of UGAT to surface relevant and urgent issues and to foster exchange swirling around the discipline’s theoretical and methodological concerns.
Eufracio C. Abaya
President, UGAT
Saturday, October 19, 1996
Indigenous Peoples of the Philippines : Knowledge, Power and Struggles
Indigenous Peoples of the Philippines : Knowledge, Power and Struggles : Proceedings of the UGAT 18th National Conference, October 17-19, 1996, La Trinidad, Benguet.
Citation:
Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc. (1996). Indigenous Peoples of the Philippines : Knowledge, Power and Struggles : Proceedings of the UGAT 18th National Conference, October 17-19, 1996, La Trinidad, Benguet. Quezon City : UGAT (Ugnayang Pang-Agham Tao, University of the Philippines).
GN 671 P5 U32 1996
158 pp.
From:
http://ilib.upd.edu.ph/servlet/template/opac%2CDetails.vm/type/brief/from/search?marcid=275532
Citation:
Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc. (1996). Indigenous Peoples of the Philippines : Knowledge, Power and Struggles : Proceedings of the UGAT 18th National Conference, October 17-19, 1996, La Trinidad, Benguet. Quezon City : UGAT (Ugnayang Pang-Agham Tao, University of the Philippines).
GN 671 P5 U32 1996
158 pp.
From:
http://ilib.upd.edu.ph/servlet/template/opac%2CDetails.vm/type/brief/from/search?marcid=275532
Sunday, October 29, 1995
UGAT 17th Annual Conference - In Photos
UGNAYANG PANG-AGHAMTAO, INC. (UGAT)
Anthropological Association of the Philippines
17th Annual Conference
ANTHROPOLOGY OF DISASTER
26-28 October 1995
Nueva Ecija
Anthropological Association of the Philippines
17th Annual Conference
ANTHROPOLOGY OF DISASTER
26-28 October 1995
Nueva Ecija
IN PHOTOS
Pons Bennagen
Boi Abaya
Angelo Bernardo / Joji Roquia
Sweet Cabanilla
Raul Pertierra
Jaja Paulate / Etoy Castro / Zandro Villanueva
Jun Estacio
Monday, September 19, 1994
In honor of our beloved Aling Naty
In honor of our beloved Aling Naty
Let us pause for a few minutes from our work and pray for the soul of Miss Natividad Noriega, “Aling Naty”, as she was fondly called by her friends.
Miss Noriega exemplified a loyal U.P. administrative employee. As curator of the National Institute of Geological Sciences in Diliman, she kept the University’s mineralogical, petrological and paleontological collections in order. She pursued her work with dedication and excellence.
Miss Noriega underwent intensive training in curatorial work here and abroad. When the late Dr. Otley Beyer turned over his collections to U.P., he stipulated in the contract that Miss Noriega should take care of and manage the collections. It is well-known in scientific circles how meticulous Dr. Beyer treated his lifetime collections; to have designated Miss Norlega to take charge of these priceless artifacts is indeed proof of her reliability and integrity.
Miss Noriega, was truly an example of a Pahinungód, a person whose daily life was given in service to God and her fellow human beings. Miss Noriega leaves a special heritage of dedicated service and honor that we in the University of the Philippines value and are proud of.
Emil Q. Javier
President, University of the Philippines, 1993-1999
19 September 1994
Let us pause for a few minutes from our work and pray for the soul of Miss Natividad Noriega, “Aling Naty”, as she was fondly called by her friends.
Miss Noriega exemplified a loyal U.P. administrative employee. As curator of the National Institute of Geological Sciences in Diliman, she kept the University’s mineralogical, petrological and paleontological collections in order. She pursued her work with dedication and excellence.
Miss Noriega underwent intensive training in curatorial work here and abroad. When the late Dr. Otley Beyer turned over his collections to U.P., he stipulated in the contract that Miss Noriega should take care of and manage the collections. It is well-known in scientific circles how meticulous Dr. Beyer treated his lifetime collections; to have designated Miss Norlega to take charge of these priceless artifacts is indeed proof of her reliability and integrity.
Miss Noriega, was truly an example of a Pahinungód, a person whose daily life was given in service to God and her fellow human beings. Miss Noriega leaves a special heritage of dedicated service and honor that we in the University of the Philippines value and are proud of.
Emil Q. Javier
President, University of the Philippines, 1993-1999
19 September 1994
Saturday, April 16, 1994
UGAT 16th Annual Conference
UGNAYANG PANG-AGHAMTAO, INC. (UGAT)
Anthropological Association of the Philippines
Anthropological Association of the Philippines
“The Anthropology of Transformation”
14-16 April 1994, Mindanao State Universty, General Santos City
Monday, December 24, 1990
Aghamtao 7
Aghamtao: Journal of the Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc. (UGAT) / Anthropological Association of the Philippines
Volume 7 / 1990
Citation:
To be uploaded soon
Table of Contents:
Testimonial to a Tireless Pioneer
Arnold Molina Azurin
On Cultural Pluralism & Nationhood
Imelda Valdez
Intoducing Philippneasian
E. Arsenio Manuel
The Incorporation of the Province of Cavite Into the World Economy
John P. McAndrew
Some Thoughts on Current Filipino Peasant Worldview
Noel Mondejar
Fiestas: A Reevaluation
Alice G. Guillermo
Folk Reasoning as Art: An Aspect of Culturral Pluralism and Nationhood
Vivencio R. Jose
Download Articles Here:
http://116.50.242.171/PSSC/index.php/agt01/issue/view/200
Source:
Private Collection
Volume 7 / 1990
Citation:
To be uploaded soon
Table of Contents:
Testimonial to a Tireless Pioneer
Arnold Molina Azurin
On Cultural Pluralism & Nationhood
Imelda Valdez
Intoducing Philippneasian
E. Arsenio Manuel
The Incorporation of the Province of Cavite Into the World Economy
John P. McAndrew
Some Thoughts on Current Filipino Peasant Worldview
Noel Mondejar
Fiestas: A Reevaluation
Alice G. Guillermo
Folk Reasoning as Art: An Aspect of Culturral Pluralism and Nationhood
Vivencio R. Jose
Download Articles Here:
http://116.50.242.171/PSSC/index.php/agt01/issue/view/200
Source:
Private Collection
Tuesday, March 24, 1987
Land is Life
Land is Life : 2nd Ancestral Land Congress, UGAT, 23-24 March, 1987 University of San Carlos, Cebu City.
Citation:
Ancestral Land Congress. (1987). Land Is Life: 2nd Ancestral Land Congress, UGAT, 23-24 March, 1987 University of San Carlos, Cebu City. Diliman, Quezon City: Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao.
HD906.A63 1987
156 leaves; 28 cm.
From:
http://www.worldcat.org/
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/asian/philhtml/philbibAuthors41.html
http://mirlyn.lib.umich.edu/F/?func=direct&doc_number=003263072&local_base=MIU01_PUB
Citation:
Ancestral Land Congress. (1987). Land Is Life: 2nd Ancestral Land Congress, UGAT, 23-24 March, 1987 University of San Carlos, Cebu City. Diliman, Quezon City: Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao.
HD906.A63 1987
156 leaves; 28 cm.
From:
http://www.worldcat.org/
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/asian/philhtml/philbibAuthors41.html
http://mirlyn.lib.umich.edu/F/?func=direct&doc_number=003263072&local_base=MIU01_PUB
Thursday, August 28, 1986
The 1986 International Conference on the Tasaday Controversy and Other Urgent Anthropological Issues
A Tasaday Folio
Compiled and edited by Jerome B. Bailen for "The 1986 International Conference on the Tasaday Controversy and Other Urgent Anthropological Issues." The conference was organized by Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc. (UGAT) and the UP Department of Anthropology.
Philippine Social Science Center
Don Mariano Marcos Avenue, Quezon City
DS666.T32 B351 1986
148 p. ; 28 cm
Compiled and edited by Jerome B. Bailen for "The 1986 International Conference on the Tasaday Controversy and Other Urgent Anthropological Issues." The conference was organized by Ugnayang Pang-Aghamtao, Inc. (UGAT) and the UP Department of Anthropology.
Philippine Social Science Center
Don Mariano Marcos Avenue, Quezon City
DS666.T32 B351 1986
148 p. ; 28 cm
Sunday, August 17, 1986
The Tasaday Controversy
Proceedings of the International Anthropological Conference on the Tasaday Controversy and other Urgent Anthropological Issues, Philippine Social Science Center, Quezon City Philippines.
15-17 August 1986
Sponsored by the Department of Anthropology, University of the Philippines and the Ugnayang Agham Tao (UGAT) Inc. (Anthropological Association of the Philippines)
Edited by Jerome B. Bailen
Download the pdf here
15-17 August 1986
Sponsored by the Department of Anthropology, University of the Philippines and the Ugnayang Agham Tao (UGAT) Inc. (Anthropological Association of the Philippines)
Edited by Jerome B. Bailen
Download the pdf here
Friday, August 15, 1986
The Tasaday Controversy
Program Schedule
The International Conference on the Tasaday Controversy and other Urgent Anthropological Issues, Philippine Social Science Center, Quezon City Philippines.
15-17 August 1986
Philippine Social Science Center
Don Mariano Marcos Avenue
Diliman, Quezon City
Sponsored by the Department of Anthropology, University of the Philippines and the Ugnayang Agham Tao (UGAT) Inc. (Anthropological Association of the Philippines)
Program brochure courtesy of the E Arsenio Manuel family
The International Conference on the Tasaday Controversy and other Urgent Anthropological Issues, Philippine Social Science Center, Quezon City Philippines.
15-17 August 1986
Philippine Social Science Center
Don Mariano Marcos Avenue
Diliman, Quezon City
Sponsored by the Department of Anthropology, University of the Philippines and the Ugnayang Agham Tao (UGAT) Inc. (Anthropological Association of the Philippines)
Tuesday, August 12, 1986
The Gentle Tasaday - John Nance
The Gentle Tasaday
John Nance
Citation:
Nance, John. (1975). The Gentle Tasaday: A Stone Age People in the Philippine Rain Forest. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
490 pages.
John Nance
Citation:
Nance, John. (1975). The Gentle Tasaday: A Stone Age People in the Philippine Rain Forest. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
490 pages.
Stone Age Men of the Philippines: Nat Geo Aug 1972
Stone Age Men of the Philippines
National Geographic, August 1972
National Geographic, August 1972
The cover story that sparked one of the biggest controversies in Philippine Anthropology.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)